Reel 1 · Drishyam0%
Essay · Malayalam · 2013 / 2021

Drishyam 2

A Writer’s Conscience

Five languages, five Georgekuttys, one buried secret. A sequel that is less about catching a man than about a writer who could not let his hero walk free.

A gouache night scene in monsoon rain: a moustached man in a white mundu stands under a black umbrella on a wet small-town road, facing a single-screen cinema whose glowing marquee reads “DRISHYAM 2”. In the puddle at his feet, the reflection shows a half-built police station.
Frame 1What you see is what you are shown. The rest stays under the floor.

Spoiler slip This essay discusses the premise of Drishyam (2013) in full. The twists of Drishyam 2 are left alone.

If you live in India and have not seen Drishyam, you have waived all your rights to be called a film appreciator. You cannot even call yourself a simple filmgoer. Better find a rock and start living under it.

Drishyam is, originally, a 2013 Malayalam thriller. “Originally” because the film was then remade in Kannada, Telugu, Tamil and Hindi. Not dubbed. Remade. And remade with “bankable” stars. The Malayalam original starred Mohanlal; the Kannada Drishya starred V. Ravichandran; the Telugu Drushyam starred Venkatesh; the Tamil Papanasam starred Kamal Haasan; and the Hindi Drishyam starred Ajay Devgn. Five superstars, five industries, one story, all inside roughly two years. Now you see that the first paragraph was not an exaggeration.

Reel 1 · Drishyam (2013)

Scene 01One Story, Five Languages

What drove this frenzy of remakes? A superbly tight-knit story by Jeethu Joseph. At its core, Drishyam is a well-crafted thriller, ripe with surprise and suspense, a cat-and-mouse game played to perfection. It is the kind of script that producers in other languages watch once and immediately reach for the phone.

The story belongs to a family man, Georgekutty. He began life as an orphan, barely schooled, and through plain hard work has built a small cable TV business in a rural town. All Georgekutty has is his family: his wife Rani and two daughters. And in the most filmy way possible, he is ready to go to any length to protect them. He also watches an absurd number of films, which matters more than it first appears.

One stormy night, a boy tries to blackmail Georgekutty’s elder daughter, Anju, with a clip from a hidden camera. Rani confronts him, there is an altercation, and Anju hits the boy with a rod. The injury is internal and almost instantly fatal. Terrified and not knowing what else to do, mother and daughter bury the boy in their compound.

Georgekutty returns the next morning and learns two things: what happened, and who the boy was. He is the son of Inspector General Geetha Prabhakar. Georgekutty understands at once that the odds are stacked against him, and the underdog sets about carving out a plan. What follows is a battle of wits between the simpleton Georgekutty and the formidable Geetha, between a man armed with nothing but cinema and a woman armed with the entire police force.

The ending is not a surprise. Georgekutty, the filmy hero, wins. The surprise is how he wins: the film keeps showing you exactly what it wants you to see, which is, after all, what the title means. Drishyam: the visual, the scene, the thing seen.

A strip of five 35 mm film frames on a rain-lit wooden table, each showing the same small house on a green hillside with a tiny man at the gate; only the colour of the sky changes from frame to frame.
Frame 2Same house, same hill, same man at the gate. Only the sky changes with the language.

Scene 02What the Remakes Kept

What is interesting is what happened to the story as it travelled. The adaptations are minimal. Names are made local: Georgekutty becomes Suyambulingam in Tamil and Vijay Salgaonkar in Hindi. A few religious and cultural references shift, so a scene with a calf in Kerala becomes a dog in Goa. Very minor changes.

The landscape is deliberately kept the same: a scenic small town with hills, rain and a police station under construction, and even a similar kind of house for the family. The story is woven so tightly that these elements are load-bearing walls. Remove one and the plot falls on your head. So, thankfully, they stay.

One superficial difference is production value: budgets, polish and the casting of supporting roles. Once a major star is signed for the lead, the remaining budget shows in the rest of the cast, roughly in proportion to the prosperity of each industry. If the Hindi Drishyam sits at the top of that scale, the Kannada Drishya sits at the other end. The Malayalam original, naturally, is kept out of any such scale. You do not grade the original against its photocopies.

Scene 03Five Georgekuttys

Beyond the economics, the five films offer an insight into the sensibilities of five film industries. Nowhere is this clearer than in the central character. Several supporting actors reprised their roles across languages (Asha Sharath played the IG in the Malayalam, Kannada, Telugu and Tamil versions, while Tabu took the part in Hindi), but Georgekutty was played by a different star every time. The same man, five times over. And each time he carries a different conscience.

Five antique brass compasses in a row on dark green cloth, labelled calm, crushed, serene, regretful and firm: one perfectly still, one cracked and trembling, one haloed, one smudged, one polished to a shine.
Frame 3Five compasses, one north. The needle is the same; the hand holding it is not.

Mohanlal (Malayalam) plays Georgekutty as a man of means and ends. There is no hint of remorse (and remember, a death has occurred), nor any doubt. No internal drama unfolds within him. The end is to save his family, and the means are justified by the end. His morality is a compass: it always points firmly to north, cold, calm and steady. In the crucial moments, Mohanlal is in control; he is running the game, not playing it. There is something of the Gita’s advice about him.

कर्मण्येवाधिकारस्ते मा फलेषु कदाचन।

You have a right to the action, never to its fruits. So act, and do not be shaken.

Bhagavad Gita 2.47, loosely

He acts. He is not shaken.

Kamal Haasan (Tamil) is never calm. He is in turmoil, the most disturbed of all the Georgekuttys. He carries the guilt of the death, begs for forgiveness and empathises with the very people he is deceiving. The treatment is more dramatic: if Mohanlal has slightly wet eyes, Kamal Haasan is a full-blown crying wreck. Where Mohanlal appears to be controlling the game, Kamal Haasan seems to be playing out his luck, and this, curiously, heightens the tension. You are never sure he will hold.

Ravichandran (Kannada) rises above all such deliberation. He carries a Zen-like calm. This Georgekutty has moved beyond means and ends; for him it was a kind of destiny, something that had to be done and got done. If the Malayalam Georgekutty chooses to stay oblivious to the morality of what happened, and the Tamil Georgekutty torments himself for hours over the loss of a life, the Kannada Georgekutty holds a firm, reasoned justification for it.

Venkatesh (Telugu) returns to the roots of means and ends but adds a tinge of remorse: an acknowledgement that whatever happened was wrong and probably should not have happened.

Ajay Devgn (Hindi) is resolute. His belief system is closest to the Kannada version, fully justifying the act, but his words are closer to the Telugu version. The Hindi Georgekutty says remorseful things without seeming sorry, and so comes across as slightly insincere. He says sorry the way an airline says sorry.

Put the five side by side and a pattern emerges. The plot is identical. The camera angles are nearly identical. What changes is the answer to one question: how should a good man feel after doing a bad thing? Calm, says Kerala. Crushed, says Tamil Nadu. Serene, says Karnataka. Regretful, says Andhra. Firm in deed and soft in speech, says Bombay.

Can cinema offer an insight into the people who make it and the audiences who watch it? I think it can, but it is up to you to decide. After watching all five films, of course.

INTERVAL

Six years pass. The cable TV office becomes a cinema hall. The police station is finished. Somebody is still watching.

Samosas at the counter · Please return to your seats · Reel 2 begins shortly

Reel 2 · Drishyam 2 (2021)

Scene 04A Sequel the Way Sequels Should Be

Now to the sequel, Drishyam 2, which arrived in 2021, in Malayalam, straight to streaming. Just as this essay took its sweet time getting to the point, Drishyam 2 has a long, slow first half. And hopefully, like the film, this essay also manages to bring all its threads together at the end.

Drishyam 2 is a sequel the way sequels should be. Not one of those sequels where a kidnapping in part one means a bigger kidnapping in part two, with a helicopter. It picks up the thread six years after the first film. There is no new murder. The film still revolves around the original death and the original secret. It has the same cat-and-mouse game, the same battle of wits and the same unexpected turns, but it is about what the first film left behind.

Scene 05The Writer’s Conscience

Drishyam 2 confronts the essential dilemma of the first film. From a moral standpoint, a crime went unpunished. And not a crime like a heist, where you loot an unscrupulous tycoon or a predatory bank and can wave the Robin Hood flag. In Drishyam, a death was hidden and a family got away with it. The audience cheered. We wanted Georgekutty to win, and he did.

That moral void troubles someone: the creator of this universe, the writer.

So in Drishyam 2, Jeethu Joseph deals with the fact that “Georgekutty got away,” and cleverly changes the question.

Georgekutty got away from prison. But did he get away from punishment?The question Drishyam 2 asks
A screenwriter at an old typewriter in a rain-lit room at night; a tiny figure of a man with an umbrella has stepped out of the typed page and is walking away across the desk, while the writer’s large shadow on the wall leans after him. A note on the wall reads “got away?”.
Frame 4A writer is a strange kind of god: he decides who escapes, and then has to live with it.

This is what makes the sequel interesting to me. A writer is a strange kind of god. He decides who lives and who dies, who is caught and who escapes, and then he has to live with his decisions for years, especially when the film becomes a phenomenon and the entire country has memorised his ending. A sequel is a chance to return to the scene of the crime. Jeethu Joseph returns not to reverse the verdict (that would be a cheat) but to serve the sentence that the first film skipped. If the law could not punish Georgekutty, the story will.

Watch the film this way and the long first half stops being slow. It becomes the sentence being served.

Scene 06The Chess Player Who Can Never Stand Up

Georgekutty’s life six years later is that of a chess player who must constantly think ten or twelve moves ahead. The crucial difference: this game never ends. In chess, someone eventually says checkmate and everyone goes home. Georgekutty’s opponents keep changing and refreshing themselves, a new IG, a new team, new methods, but Georgekutty must stay on his toes forever. He cannot win; he can only avoid losing, every day, for the rest of his life.

A man plays chess alone on a rainy veranda at night; his pieces are tiny figures of his wife and daughters. The chair across the board is empty, but behind it a long queue of police officers stretches into the rain, waiting their turn. A clock beside the board has no hands.
Frame 5The opponent changes. The clock has no hands. The game does not end.

The film deals with the loneliness of being Georgekutty. He cannot trust anyone with his secrets, not even his wife, and yet he has to hold his family together. Rani lives with a fear she cannot name. Anju lives with something worse: panic attacks, the body remembering what the mind is told to forget. The family that Georgekutty saved is safe, but it is not well. It has been preserved the way you preserve something in a jar.

This is the punishment. Not a cell, but a house where the windows are never fully open. Not a judge, but a life of permanent vigilance. A man who once watched films to relax now has to live like one: always on guard, always performing, always aware of the camera.

A small house on a green hillside at night sits under an enormous glass bell jar; rain runs off the glass, the house inside is dry and lit but every window is shut, and at the foot of the hill a parked car’s headlights watch.
Frame 6The sentence: not a cell, but a house where the windows are never fully open.

Scene 07From Underdog to Rich Man

The film is also a social commentary, and a sharp one. In the first film the tight-knit rural community is entirely on Georgekutty’s side. He is “poor Georgekutty,” the cable-TV man being hounded by a powerful police officer, and the villagers rally behind the underdog.

In Drishyam 2, Georgekutty has prospered. The small-time cable operator now owns a cinema hall and dreams of producing a film. And the same people who protected him now detest the new, “rich” Georgekutty. They gossip behind his back. They believe in his guilt. They are itching to see him fall.

A village street split in two by a lamp post. On the left, years ago, neighbours shelter a modest cable-TV man under their umbrellas. On the right, the same man steps out of a car in front of his new cinema hall while the same neighbours whisper and point.
Frame 7Same street, same faces. Only the bank balance changed, and with it, the verdict.

Nothing about the case has changed. No new evidence has appeared in the village. Only his bank balance has changed, and with it, public opinion. Sympathy, it turns out, is reserved for those below us. Climb a few steps and the same neighbours who once hid you will happily point you out. In India we like an underdog only as long as he remains under.

Scene 08Two Family Men

Drishyam 2 is also a bit meta. Throughout the film there are discussions about writing a screenplay for an upcoming film: a man in the story is trying to write the story, while the man who wrote the story watches him. And there is an interesting parallel built into the plot.

Georgekutty, a family man who has hidden a crime, comes close to being caught because of another family man, a police informant. This informant is himself a killer, and his decision to inform on Georgekutty is driven by “family” reasons.

Two men mirror each other across a rain-streaked window at night, each clutching a framed family photograph: one calm and composed, the other thin and haunted with a police jeep’s glow behind him. A brass compass lies on the sill between them beside the note “things just have to be done”.
Frame 8Two men, two families, one compass. Only the craftsmanship differs.

This sub-plot brings us back to means and ends. The informant’s end is his own family; his means are sacrificing Georgekutty’s family. Georgekutty’s end is his wife and daughters; his means required sacrificing Geetha’s son and Geetha’s peace. Both men are single-minded. One is sophisticated enough to stay ahead of the police; the other is not. But both carry the same unwavering compass: things just have to be done.

The film quietly puts a mirror in front of its hero, and in front of us.

Scene 09Luck, and the Hero Who Is Lucky

On its own, Drishyam 2 can feel slow, and it has a few logical leaps compared to the near-perfect first film. But it should be seen in the larger context, as a second chapter of the same story rather than a standalone thriller.

It begins like Georgekutty’s slow march towards a confession. Then it reveals itself as a thriller and turns Georgekutty into a meticulous planner, a man who has spent six years preparing for a day that might never come. And in the end, the film winks at its own audience: it takes a great deal of luck, and so what if the hero is lucky? It is just a film.

That line is the writer talking to himself. Yes, Georgekutty walks out again. Yes, it requires luck. But the writer has made sure we understand what walking free costs: no rest, no trust, no peace. The conscience has not been cleared; it has been paid in instalments.

A patient must-watch!

Scene 10The Illusion Travels

On a side note, Drishyam has broken more than Indian language barriers. It was remade in Sinhala as Dharmayuddhaya, and it reached Chinese shores as Sheep Without a Shepherd, where it became a big box-office hit. The sequel, too, has been remade, in Telugu and Kannada and later in Hindi with Ajay Devgn returning as Vijay Salgaonkar, and a third chapter has been announced. Georgekutty, it seems, will be serving his sentence for a while.

An old film projector throws an amber beam out of a booth window into the night; the beam splits onto several floating screens over a faint map of Asia, each showing the same rainy house on a hill, while a small white sheep stands lost in the light.
Frame 9One illusion, many screens. And somewhere in the beam, a sheep without a shepherd.

And if, even after knowing all this, you still do not wish to watch these films, then you deserve to be crushed by the rock you live under.

The Breakdown

Box office board · Balcony & stalls
  • Story99%
  • A genuine sequel99%
  • Performances90%
  • Georgekutty99%
  • Just like that!99%

A patient must-watch. Bring an umbrella, and an alibi.

— Vinaay Patil

Where to Watch

Find a seat. Tell us where you are; we will find the screen.

Showing options for

Looking up streaming platforms…

Availability data from JustWatch via TMDB. Platforms change their line-ups often, so check before you settle in.

Filed Under